Addendum #2​​

​​​With this addendum, the following files have​​ been modified:

• Attachment 8, Litigation and or Contract Compliance Difficulties 
• Attachment 9, Program Reach Worksheet ​

​To support version control, we have added a version number in the document header (e.g., “v2” appears after the document name in the upper right corner of the documents). This practice will continue with future document updates. 

Attachment 8: Litigation and or Contract Compliance Difficulties 

The following instruction is clarified in v2 of Attachment 8, Litigation and or Contract Compliance Difficulties: 

• ​If a YES answer is selected, please explain fully the circumstances in section A, item 10 of the RFA Program Narrative Template (Attachment 3) (PDF). 
  

Applicant action: As of this addendum posting, applicants must download and use Attachment 8: Litigation and or Contract Compliance Difficulties, v2 (PDF). 

Attachment 9: Program Reach Worksheet ​​

The following issues were identified and corrected in v2 of Attachment 9, Program Reach Worksheet (EXCEL): 

1. Tab: Reach Worksheet Overview:

   Language regarding proposed program reach was updated to reflect the following: 
   

   CDPH/MCAH developed the Reach Worksheet to assist applicants in developing a reasonable proposed program reach. Applicants must complete the State Method column following the instructions outlined below. For this application, the minimum program reach requirement is 50 youth per 1.0 FTE case manager. If the State Method yields a program reach less than 50 per 1.0 FTE case manager, the application will not be scored even if the applicant proposes an annual reach higher than 50 per 1.0 FTE case manager in R16a, R17a, or R18a, respective to fiscal year. Cells highlighted tan will accept user-entered information; all others are locked from editing. Enter all information in positive numbers. Submit this completed worksheet with application. 
   

2. ​​Tab: Reach Works​heet Instruction:

   • Embedded links in R4, R5, R6/R7/R8, and R12 instructions have been removed.
   • The following instruction was updated to read as follows:
     

     Proposed S​ervice Area	R3	​​Enter a brief description of the geography proposed to serve; this should align with the information you outlined in Attachment 10 (PDF), Service Area Needs and Strategies. Agencies proposing to serve sub-county geographies must include proposed Medical Service Study Area (MSSA) numbers​​.

     
     
   • ​The following instruction was updated to read as follows (updated terminology here and in the worksheet, updated table reference):
     

     Projected Expe​ctant and Parenting Birthing Persons	R4	​​Enter the projected number of expectant and parenting birthing persons in proposed service area in 2023. This information can be found in Appendix 2 (PDF), Table 1, column 3 for counties, and Table 3 for MSSAs.​

     
     
   • The following instruction was updated to read as follows (the page number for Technical Notes in Appendix 2 was removed):
     

     Recruitment​ Adjustme​​​nt	R10	​​This cell auto calculates a recruitment adjustment of 56.5% based on statewide estimates of the average monthly population of parenting females served in Jan 2009–Jul 2013 by Cal-Learn and AFLP programs. This number represents the percent of the total eligible population not likely to be referred and /or recruited into the program (see Technical Notes in Appendix 2 (PDF) for more information). This number is subtracted from the eligible population.​

     
     
   • The following instruction was updated to read as follows (updated terminology here and in worksheet):
     

     Adjustmen​t for projected annual decline in population of first-time mothers and birthing people	R12	​​Enter the percent provided in Appendix 2 (PDF), Table 2, column 2, that reflects the average percent decline in first-time mothers and birthing people in the county applicant is proposing to serve. Agencies proposing to serve more than one-county should average the annual decline across counties.​​

     
     
   • The following instruction was updated to read as follows:​
     

     Proposed Program Reach - Youth	R16a, R17a, R18a	​​Enter the proposed number of youth to reach for each fiscal year of the award. For this application, the minimum program reach requirement is 50 youth per 1.0 FTE case manager. If the State Method yields a program reach less than 50 per 1.0 FTE case manager, the application will not be scored even if the applicant proposes an annual reach higher than 50 per 1.0 FTE case manager in R16a, R17a, or R18a, respective to fiscal year.​​

     
     
   • The following instruction was updated (clarification of FTE) to read as follows:
     

     Proposed ​Program Reach - CM FTE	R16b, R17b, R18b	​​Enter the total proposed case manager (CM) FTE for each fiscal year of the award (e.g. 1.0, 1.5). Minimum is 1.0 (100%) total case manager FTE. Applicant's proposed annual program reach must be at least 50 per 1.0 (100%) CM FTE and should not be greater than the value in R13, R14, or R15, respective to fiscal year.​​

   
   

3. ​​Tab: Reach Worksheet:

   • R4 and R12: terminology has been updated and matches the instructions.
     

   • R6, R7, R8, and R9: missing formulas have been added.

   • R16a, R17a, R18a: validation for these cells have been corrected to read that the minimum reach is 50 youth.

   • R16b, R17b, R18b: validation for these cells have been removed.​

Applicant action: As of this addendum posting, applicants must download and use Attachment 9: Program Reach Worksheet, v2 (EXCEL). 

Note: Excel files are best downloaded from Chrome.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​